ooligo

Outreach vs Salesloft

pairwise By Marius Bughiu Last updated 2026-08-05

Compare side-by-side

Outreach Salesloft
Pricing custom custom
Score
7.5
7.5
AI-native No No
MCP No Yes
API Yes Yes
Integrations
salesforce hubspot slack gmail outlook gong chorus linkedin
salesforce hubspot slack gmail outlook gong clari zoominfo

Outreach and Salesloft are still the two enterprise sales engagement incumbents, but they are no longer the same kind of company. Salesloft is half of a merged forecasting-plus-execution vendor. Outreach spent 2026 rebuilding its surface around agents and repricing accordingly. Both facts that used to decide this pair — Salesloft’s chat bundle and “neither has agent access worth paying for” — are dead. Here is what actually separates them now.

What changed since 2025

Clari acquired Salesloft from Vista Equity Partners and closed on 3 December 2025. The combined company operates as Clari + Salesloft, reports roughly $450 million ARR across 5,000+ customers, and as of August 2026 has still not announced a new company name. The integration is shipping release by release rather than as one repackaging: the June 2026 release put Clari Copilot inside Salesloft on one login, with recordings, transcripts, AI summaries, and action items landing in Salesloft’s Activity Feed and Deal Summary Agent instead of a separate product. Existing Conversations customers migrate later. Separately, Clari + Salesloft announced Drift’s gradual sunset in March 2026 and named 1mind the exclusive successor, so the platform’s Chat Agents surface is 1mind’s product, not Salesloft-built.

Outreach moved from outreach.io to outreach.ai and relaunched on 27 April 2026 as an “agentic AI platform for revenue teams.” The new surface is Outreach Omni (a conversational agent in Slack and mobile), Agent Studio (where RevOps builds and schedules custom agents on a visual canvas), and named agents — Meeting Prep Agent, Deal Agent, which drafts CRM field updates for rep approval, AI Topics Explorer, and a Kaia coaching agent. Packaging moved with it: the Amplify tiers meter AI credits on top of seats.

Both shipped MCP, four months apart, and both gate it. Outreach’s MCP server went generally available on 24 February 2026 and runs as server and client, so external agents can read Outreach context and Outreach can call out; access requires an active licensed seat with the Amplify add-on enabled. Salesloft’s launched in April 2026, was listed natively in Claude’s connector directory by the June release, and added an MCP server for ChatGPT in the August 2026 release; it requires the Salesloft Agentic add-on.

Where Salesloft wins

  • Forecasting arrives in the same contract. Clari is the most-deployed forecasting and deal-inspection product in the category. If your 2025 shortlist was Outreach plus Clari on two order forms, one order form now covers both jobs. Outreach’s Forecast module exists but is not the thing CROs benchmark Clari against.
  • MCP breadth, not just MCP presence. Salesloft’s server exposes cadence and activity execution data, Clari Copilot call intelligence, and forecast and deal-inspection data through one connector, with write-back. Outreach’s exposes engagement context — real, and unavailable anywhere else in your stack, but one layer. If the plan is “our analysts query revenue data from Claude,” Salesloft answers more of the question today.
  • The seat minimum, which is the actual splitter. Salesloft’s commitments typically start around 10-15 seats against Outreach’s 25-50. For a 20-rep team this is not a preference, it is the only one of the two you can buy.
  • Onboarding speed. The cadence-first design is more opinionated and reps ramp faster on it. Fewer knobs, clearer default paths — the same trait that becomes a ceiling at very large scale.

Where Outreach wins

  • Configurability at 200+ reps. More permission granularity, deeper Salesforce handling on the edge cases (custom objects, Apex-driven validation, audit-trail mapping), and an admin model that survives a territory reorg. This is accumulated edge cases, not a feature you can ship in a quarter.
  • You can build your own agents. Agent Studio is a canvas where RevOps composes and schedules custom agents. Salesloft ships a fixed roster — Account Research, Person Research, Ask Salesloft, Deal Summaries, MEDDPICC extraction, Sales Strategist — plus Rhythm’s prioritization layer, and no equivalent builder. If your AI plan has steps a vendor did not anticipate, that gap matters.
  • Outreach is also an MCP client. Its agents can reach outward into Salesforce Agentforce, Microsoft Copilot, SharePoint, Google Drive, or Glean. Salesloft’s server is read-and-write into Salesloft. One direction versus two.
  • No post-merger packaging risk. Salesloft’s entitlements are being recombined mid-term with no settled SKU map and no company name. Outreach’s roadmap is boring by comparison, and boring has a price you would otherwise pay in renegotiation.

The argument that inverted

The 2025 version of this page said Salesloft bundled Drift, so conversation intelligence came included while Outreach plus Gong ran $50-80/seat more. Do not reuse it. Drift is being sunset, 1mind owns that surface, and website conversion is now a separate contract with its own exit path. Salesloft’s bundle argument runs through forecasting instead.

The breach belongs in the same paragraph, because it is the one buyer-side asymmetry in this pair. Between 8 and 18 August 2025, a threat cluster tracked as UNC6395 stole Drift OAuth tokens and used them to pull Salesforce data — accounts, contacts, opportunities, cases — from hundreds of organizations; Google put the potential blast radius above 700 companies. Salesloft took Drift offline and revoked tokens. Guard: scope the Salesforce integration to the minimum object set, require the current SOC 2 report and the written post-mortem before signing, and own the OAuth rotation schedule yourself rather than inheriting the vendor’s.

Pricing, quantified

Both are quote-gated, and they conceal different amounts. Outreach publishes the structure without rates: four Amplify tiers by AI-credit allowance — Essentials at 10,000 credits, Core at 25,000, Plus at 50,000, Pro at 100,000 — stated as seat-based pricing plus consumption with no platform fee. Salesloft’s pricing page is a heading and a contact form; three editions exist (Essentials, Advanced, Premier) and nothing about them is published.

For a 50-seat deployment, Outreach Engage-only lands near $72,000/year and a fully loaded configuration with Meet, Deal, Forecast, and Amplify credits clears $150,000-165,000 in year one, before $5,000-25,000 of implementation. Salesloft’s procurement record runs lower: Vendr’s median annual contract across 703 purchases is roughly $30,700 at an 18% average discount, in a $5,200-$145,000 range, with negotiated seat bands of about $90-130 at 25-75 users, a dialer at $300-400 per user per year, and Conversation Intelligence adding 20-40% on the base.

Net of edition matching, Salesloft comes in roughly 10-25% under Outreach per seat, and below 25 seats the comparison stops being about percentages because Outreach has no entry point. On both sides, the agent layer and MCP access sit behind a separately quoted add-on. Price the base edition first and negotiate that add-on as its own line, because the AI is not in the platform fee for either vendor.

Verdict

  • Pick Salesloft if you are under 100 reps, if forecasting is anywhere on the shortlist, or if you want revenue data reachable from Claude and ChatGPT this quarter rather than next roadmap.
  • Pick Outreach if you run 200+ reps where permission models and audit trails get load-bearing, if your AI plan needs agents you build rather than agents you enable, or if a mid-integration vendor is not something procurement will sign.
  • If you genuinely cannot decide, buy Salesloft. The median team comparing this pair is 25-100 reps, and three of the four things that decide it at that size — seat minimum, per-seat price, forecasting in one contract — point the same direction. Outreach’s advantages are real and they concentrate above 200 reps.
  • Neither fits if you have fewer than 25 reps and needed a sequencer with a contact database attached, which is an Apollo conversation and covered in Apollo vs Salesloft and Apollo vs Outreach — or if you want the software to run outbound instead of your reps, which is 11x or RegieOne, a different purchase that should not be cross-shopped on seat price.

The mistake this page exists to prevent: re-running a 2025 evaluation. The functional gap between these two is still narrow, but the two facts that used to break the tie — chat bundling and the absence of agent access — have both been replaced, and the correct tiebreakers now are forecasting scope, seat minimum, and which side of an MCP connection you need to be on.